SAP architects and development leaders deciding whether a clean-core initiative has enough evidence and operating ownership to begin.
Which foundational controls are present, which are missing, and what evidence is required before interpreting a clean-core score.
Decision context
A clean-core assessment should evaluate the operating system around customizations, not just count them. Inventory coverage, dependency evidence, extension classification, accountable dispositions, validation states, exception expiry, and repeat monitoring determine whether the program can sustain a cleaner core.
This browser-based assessment scores declared readiness controls and returns gaps. It does not inspect source code, send answers to a model, or issue an SAP certification.
For evidence-backed analysis, Adranum can ingest supported ATC, readiness, ABAP, abapGit, DDIC, requirements, and connector observations. The product preserves scan coverage and exposes the factors behind its score.
Interactive assessment
Check clean-core operating readiness
Select only controls supported by current evidence. Answers stay in this browser.
What the workflow must cover
Control-level questions
Evaluate inventory, coverage, dependency mapping, dispositions, validation, exceptions, ownership, and repeat monitoring as separate controls.
Transparent scoring
Every selected control contributes visibly; missing controls remain listed and no proprietary maturity benchmark is implied.
Actionable gaps
Map each missing control to the next evidence or governance step rather than returning a context-free percentage.
Local calculation
Answers remain in the browser and are not uploaded by the assessment component.
Implementation workflow
Start with a bounded customer scenario and explicit acceptance criteria. Preserve native SAP permissions and accountable review while the software creates a repeatable evidence chain.
- Answer the readiness controls honestly.
- Review the score and missing foundations.
- Assign owners for evidence collection and exception policy.
- Run a supported artifact assessment.
- Repeat after each remediation and release cycle.
Evidence to require
A transformation claim should resolve to observable artifacts, decisions, and execution receipts. Ask for the following evidence in a representative evaluation:
- Declared control state
- Visible score contribution
- Missing-control list
- Recommended next evidence
- No uploaded responses
Boundaries and non-claims
Adranum separates analysis, proposal, human review, package creation, customer-local validation, and production execution. A later state never rewrites the evidence that supported an earlier decision.
- Self-declared answers are not independently verified.
- The result is not an official SAP assessment or certification.
- Artifact coverage and customer-run validation are required for technical conclusions.
Buyer checklist
- Is the customization inventory complete?
- Can dependencies be explained from evidence?
- Does every exception have an owner and expiry?
- Are proposed changes distinguished from SAP-tested changes?
- Will the assessment be repeated after releases?